Model Capabilities Comparison
Compare vision, tools, reasoning and caching support.
With the default inputs, Model capabilities compared — 326 models. Enter your own numbers below to recompute instantly; the full step-by-step math is shown under the worked example.
Compare which models support vision, tool use, reasoning and prompt caching in one table, so you can shortlist by capability, not just price.
How this is calculated
We put each model's support for vision, tool use, reasoning and prompt caching in one table so you can filter by capability, not just price. It's a feature matrix rather than a cost estimate.
Is this a good result? What to do next
Shortlist by the capabilities you actually need first, then compare price and quality among the survivors. A cheaper model that lacks vision or tool use isn't a real option for those workloads.
Typical planning ranges
- Tool use
- most current flagships
- Vision / reasoning / caching
- varies by model
- Filter first
- on required features
Ranges are typical planning figures to sanity-check your result, not authoritative benchmarks. Your numbers will vary with use case, volume, and vendor.
How to improve this number
- List your must-have capabilities before comparing price.
- Drop models missing a hard requirement early.
- Verify capability quality on your own tasks.
Common mistakes
- Choosing on price before checking capability support.
- Assuming all flagships support every feature.
When to use a different approach
For price, use the LLM pricing comparison. For context size, use the model context window comparison.
Worked example (defaults)
With the default inputs above, here is the result:
Frequently asked questions
Do all models support tool use?+
Most current flagships do, but support for vision, reasoning and prompt caching varies. Use this table to filter models by the features you need.