MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3 Max
Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper by about $392.00/month.
| MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xiaomi | alibaba |
| Input / 1M | $0.1400 | $1.20 |
| Output / 1M | $0.2800 | $6.00 |
| Per request (sample) | $0.000280 | $0.00420 |
| Monthly (sample) | $28.00 | $420.00 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Vision | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Arena · Overall | 1427 | 1404 |
| Arena · Coding | 1436 | — |
Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.
Compare on your own workload
MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 Max are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3 Max?
For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper, costing about $28.00/month versus $420.00/month.
What is the context window of MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 Max?
MiMo-V2.5 supports 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3 Max supports 262,144 tokens.
Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.