MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper by about $12.00/month.
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xiaomi | alibaba |
| Input / 1M | $0.4350 | $0.1875 |
| Output / 1M | $0.8700 | $1.13 |
| Per request (sample) | $0.000870 | $0.000750 |
| Monthly (sample) | $87.00 | $75.00 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Vision | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Arena · Overall | 1445 | — |
| Arena · Coding | 1474 | — |
Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.
Compare on your own workload
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.
Used unless you set active users below.
Results update automatically as you type.
| Qwen3.6 Flash | Alibaba | $0.000750 | $75.00 | $900.00 | 1,000,000 |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Xiaomi | $0.000870 | $87.00 | $1,044.00 | 1,048,576 |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen3.6 Flash?
For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper, costing about $75.00/month versus $87.00/month.
What is the context window of MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3.6 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.