AI Calculator Pro

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper by about $525.00/month.

GPT-4.1Qwen3.6 Flash
Provideropenaialibaba
Input / 1M$2.00$0.1875
Output / 1M$8.00$1.13
Per request (sample)$0.00600$0.000750
Monthly (sample)$600.00$75.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
VisionYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Arena · Overall1372
Arena · Coding1375
Arena · Math & reasoning1360
Arena · Agentic / tool use1362

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Flash are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Qwen3.6 Flash at $75.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Qwen3.6 FlashAlibaba$0.000750$75.00$900.001,000,000
GPT-4.1OpenAI$0.00600$600.00$7,200.001,000,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3.6 Flash?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper, costing about $75.00/month versus $600.00/month.

What is the context window of GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Flash?

GPT-4.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3.6 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.