GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper by about $330.00/month.
| GLM-5.2 | GPT-4.1 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | zhipu | openai |
| Input / 1M | $1.40 | $0.1000 |
| Output / 1M | $4.40 | $0.4000 |
| Per request (sample) | $0.00360 | $0.000300 |
| Monthly (sample) | $360.00 | $30.00 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Vision | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Arena · Overall | 1463 | 1300 |
| Arena · Coding | 1587 | 1305 |
| Arena · Math & reasoning | — | 1290 |
Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.
Compare on your own workload
GLM-5.2 and GPT-4.1 Nano are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.
Used unless you set active users below.
Results update automatically as you type.
| GPT-4.1 Nano | OpenAI | $0.000300 | $30.00 | $360.00 | 1,000,000 |
| GLM-5.2 | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | $0.00360 | $360.00 | $4,320.00 | 1,000,000 |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4.1 Nano?
For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper, costing about $30.00/month versus $360.00/month.
What is the context window of GLM-5.2 and GPT-4.1 Nano?
GLM-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens, while GPT-4.1 Nano supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.