AI Calculator Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper by about $550.00/month.

Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.6 Flash
Providergooglealibaba
Input / 1M$1.25$0.1875
Output / 1M$10.00$1.13
Per request (sample)$0.00625$0.000750
Monthly (sample)$625.00$75.00
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
VisionYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Arena · Overall1463
Arena · Coding1224
Arena · Math & reasoning1450
Arena · Agentic / tool use1425

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Qwen3.6 Flash at $75.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Qwen3.6 FlashAlibaba$0.000750$75.00$900.001,000,000
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle$0.00625$625.00$7,500.001,048,576

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.6 Flash?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper, costing about $75.00/month versus $625.00/month.

What is the context window of Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3.6 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.