MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper by about $225.00/month.
| MAI-Code-1-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | microsoft | alibaba |
| Input / 1M | $0.7500 | $0.1875 |
| Output / 1M | $4.50 | $1.13 |
| Per request (sample) | $0.00300 | $0.000750 |
| Monthly (sample) | $300.00 | $75.00 |
| Context window | 256,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Vision | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
Compare on your own workload
MAI-Code-1-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.
Used unless you set active users below.
Results update automatically as you type.
Result
Cheapest: Qwen3.6 Flash at $75.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
| Qwen3.6 Flash | Alibaba | $0.000750 | $75.00 | $900.00 | 1,000,000 |
| MAI-Code-1-Flash | Microsoft | $0.00300 | $300.00 | $3,600.00 | 256,000 |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MAI-Code-1-Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?
For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper, costing about $75.00/month versus $300.00/month.
What is the context window of MAI-Code-1-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash?
MAI-Code-1-Flash supports 256,000 tokens, while Qwen3.6 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.