AI Calculator Pro

GLM-5.2 vs Hunyuan Hy3

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper by about $300.00/month.

GLM-5.2Hunyuan Hy3
Providerzhiputencent
Input / 1M$1.40$0.2000
Output / 1M$4.40$0.8000
Per request (sample)$0.00360$0.000600
Monthly (sample)$360.00$60.00
Context window1,000,000262,144
VisionNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Arena · Overall14631444
Arena · Coding15871518

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

GLM-5.2 and Hunyuan Hy3 are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Hunyuan Hy3 at $60.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Hunyuan Hy3Tencent$0.000600$60.00$720.00262,144
GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu AI)$0.00360$360.00$4,320.001,000,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Hunyuan Hy3?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper, costing about $60.00/month versus $360.00/month.

What is the context window of GLM-5.2 and Hunyuan Hy3?

GLM-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens, while Hunyuan Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.