Command R vs Qwen3 Max
Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Command R is cheaper by about $375.00/month.
| Command R | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | cohere | alibaba |
| Input / 1M | $0.1500 | $1.20 |
| Output / 1M | $0.6000 | $6.00 |
| Per request (sample) | $0.000450 | $0.00420 |
| Monthly (sample) | $45.00 | $420.00 |
| Context window | 128,000 | 262,144 |
| Vision | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Arena · Overall | 1163 | 1404 |
| Arena · Coding | 1302 | — |
| Arena · Math & reasoning | 1298 | — |
Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.
Compare on your own workload
Command R and Qwen3 Max are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command R or Qwen3 Max?
For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Command R is cheaper, costing about $45.00/month versus $420.00/month.
What is the context window of Command R and Qwen3 Max?
Command R supports 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3 Max supports 262,144 tokens.
Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.