AI Calculator Pro

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, GLM-5.2 is cheaper by about $3,140.00/month.

Claude Fable 5GLM-5.2
Provideranthropiczhipu
Input / 1M$10.00$1.40
Output / 1M$50.00$4.40
Per request (sample)$0.0350$0.00360
Monthly (sample)$3,500.00$360.00
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
VisionNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Arena · Overall14541463
Arena · Coding16291587
Arena · Math & reasoning1448
Arena · Agentic / tool use1452

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.2 are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: GLM-5.2 at $360.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu AI)$0.00360$360.00$4,320.001,000,000
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$0.0350$3,500.00$42,000.001,000,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.2?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, GLM-5.2 is cheaper, costing about $360.00/month versus $3,500.00/month.

What is the context window of Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.2?

Claude Fable 5 supports 1,000,000 tokens, while GLM-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.