AI Calculator Pro

Hunyuan Hy3 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper by about $80.00/month.

Hunyuan Hy3Mistral Medium 3.1
Providertencentmistral
Input / 1M$0.2000$0.4000
Output / 1M$0.8000$2.00
Per request (sample)$0.000600$0.00140
Monthly (sample)$60.00$140.00
Context window262,144131,000
VisionNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
Arena · Overall14441350
Arena · Coding15181352
Arena · Math & reasoning1345
Arena · Agentic / tool use1342

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Hunyuan Hy3 and Mistral Medium 3.1 are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Hunyuan Hy3 at $60.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Hunyuan Hy3Tencent$0.000600$60.00$720.00262,144
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI$0.00140$140.00$1,680.00131,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Hunyuan Hy3 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper, costing about $60.00/month versus $140.00/month.

What is the context window of Hunyuan Hy3 and Mistral Medium 3.1?

Hunyuan Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.