AI Calculator Pro

Hunyuan Hy3 vs Llama 3.3 70B

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper by about $30.00/month.

Hunyuan Hy3Llama 3.3 70B
Providertencentmeta
Input / 1M$0.2000$0.6000
Output / 1M$0.8000$0.6000
Per request (sample)$0.000600$0.000900
Monthly (sample)$60.00$90.00
Context window262,144128,000
VisionNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Arena · Overall14441315
Arena · Coding15181312
Arena · Math & reasoning1305

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Hunyuan Hy3 and Llama 3.3 70B are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Hunyuan Hy3 at $60.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Hunyuan Hy3Tencent$0.000600$60.00$720.00262,144
Llama 3.3 70BMeta$0.000900$90.00$1,080.00128,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Hunyuan Hy3 or Llama 3.3 70B?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper, costing about $60.00/month versus $90.00/month.

What is the context window of Hunyuan Hy3 and Llama 3.3 70B?

Hunyuan Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B supports 128,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.