AI Calculator Pro

Command A vs Hunyuan Hy3

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper by about $690.00/month.

Command AHunyuan Hy3
Providercoheretencent
Input / 1M$2.50$0.2000
Output / 1M$10.00$0.8000
Per request (sample)$0.00750$0.000600
Monthly (sample)$750.00$60.00
Context window256,000262,144
VisionNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Arena · Overall13651444
Arena · Coding13601518
Arena · Math & reasoning1355
Arena · Agentic / tool use1358

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Command A and Hunyuan Hy3 are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Hunyuan Hy3 at $60.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Hunyuan Hy3Tencent$0.000600$60.00$720.00262,144
Command ACohere$0.00750$750.00$9,000.00256,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A or Hunyuan Hy3?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Hunyuan Hy3 is cheaper, costing about $60.00/month versus $750.00/month.

What is the context window of Command A and Hunyuan Hy3?

Command A supports 256,000 tokens, while Hunyuan Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.