AI Calculator Pro

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 Scout

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper by about $1,722.00/month.

Claude Opus 4.6Llama 4 Scout
Provideranthropicmeta
Input / 1M$5.00$0.1100
Output / 1M$25.00$0.3400
Per request (sample)$0.0175$0.000280
Monthly (sample)$1,750.00$28.00
Context window1,000,00010,000,000
VisionYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Arena · Overall14491332
Arena · Coding15381330
Arena · Math & reasoning14251325
Arena · Agentic / tool use1435

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Claude Opus 4.6 and Llama 4 Scout are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Llama 4 Scout at $28.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Llama 4 ScoutMeta$0.000280$28.00$336.0010,000,000
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic$0.0175$1,750.00$21,000.001,000,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper, costing about $28.00/month versus $1,750.00/month.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4.6 and Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.