AI Calculator Pro

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K3

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Kimi K3 is cheaper by about $700.00/month.

Claude Opus 4.6Kimi K3
Provideranthropicmoonshot
Input / 1M$5.00$3.00
Output / 1M$25.00$15.00
Per request (sample)$0.0175$0.0105
Monthly (sample)$1,750.00$1,050.00
Context window1,000,0001,048,576
VisionYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Arena · Overall14491473
Arena · Coding15381679
Arena · Math & reasoning1425
Arena · Agentic / tool use1435

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K3 are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Kimi K3 at $1,050.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Kimi K3Moonshot AI$0.0105$1,050.00$12,600.001,048,576
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic$0.0175$1,750.00$21,000.001,000,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Kimi K3 is cheaper, costing about $1,050.00/month versus $1,750.00/month.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K3?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens, while Kimi K3 supports 1,048,576 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.