AI Calculator Pro

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B

Cost and capability comparison. For a sample workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens across 100,000 requests/month, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper by about $260.00/month.

Claude Haiku 4.5Llama 3.3 70B
Provideranthropicmeta
Input / 1M$1.00$0.6000
Output / 1M$5.00$0.6000
Per request (sample)$0.00350$0.000900
Monthly (sample)$350.00$90.00
Context window200,000128,000
VisionNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Arena · Overall13941315
Arena · Coding13241312
Arena · Math & reasoning1305

Intelligence scores are community Arena ratings from LMArena / arena.ai, used under CC BY 4.0. Snapshot last refreshed 28 July 2026. Scores are a relative signal, not an absolute measure of capability. A Measured score was voted on directly; an Estimated score is inherited from an identical base model (a regional/creator-prefixed hosting duplicate). See our methodology.

Compare on your own workload

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 3.3 70B are pre-loaded. Adjust the tokens and monthly volume to see which is cheaper for your usage.

Used unless you set active users below.

Results update automatically as you type.

Result
Cheapest: Llama 3.3 70B at $90.00/month
Workload: 1,000 in / 500 out × 100,000 requests/month
Llama 3.3 70BMeta$0.000900$90.00$1,080.00128,000
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic$0.00350$350.00$4,200.00200,000

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Llama 3.3 70B?

For a workload of 1,000 input and 500 output tokens over 100,000 requests/month, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper, costing about $90.00/month versus $350.00/month.

What is the context window of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 3.3 70B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B supports 128,000 tokens.

Estimates for planning only. Verify current pricing with each provider.